|
Coal-to-liquid (CTL) facilities will use substantial amounts of water,
on the same order of magnitude as other energy, agricultural and urban
uses. Compared to most electricity
generating plants, CTL plants will require significantly less water per million
Btu (MMBtu) of product.
Discussion:
The amount of water used by a coal conversion facility
depends on conversion technology, cooling technology, type of coal, elevation
of the facility and climate at the facility.
In a CTL plant, some of the water is used as a source of
hydrogen for the product and some is used for cooling and other processes. Estimates of energy balances of hypothetical CTL
plants suggest that water use could vary from1-1.5 barrel of water per barrel
of product for a zero-discharge air-cooled plant to 5-7 bbl water for barrel of
product for a plant with water cooling and less use of waste heat for process
heat or cogeneration. These estimates
assumed 2 barrels of product per ton of sub-bituminous coal (9,000 Btu/lb).
In generating plants, cooling is the main use of water. Different studies have estimated different
rates of water use for different technologies.
A key finding is that integrated gas combined cycle (IGCC) plants will
use significantly less water than conventional pulverized coal (PC) plants
(20-50 percent less by different estimates).
This is plausible in that the steam cycle, with its cooling needs,
accounts for only a portion of the electricity produced at an IGCC.
Electricity generating plants, using conventional technology,
have been built with air cooling. They
are not very common. The 290 MW Wyodak
plant near Gillette, Wyoming,
was built in 1978 and was the largest air-cooled generating plant in the US. In 2006, Basin Electric proposed building a
422 MW coal-fired, air-cooled plant in the same area. Air-cooled generating plants can require less
water per MMBtu product than CTL plants.
CTL plants need large amounts of electricity, which effectively
increases the amount of water embodied in the final product. The exact amount depends on the technologies
used in the generating plant. By way of
comparison, the water used at a conventional plant to generate electricity for
Dakota Gasification equaled about one-quarter of the in-plant water consumption
at DGI in 2004. However, the generating
portion of a plant combining CTL and IGCC would use considerably less water
than a conventional generating plant such as serves DGI.
Water consumed by actual and hypothetical uses are shown below. Consumption data are given in acre-feet per
year and in million gallons (MMgal) per day.
Water consumption by
actual and hypothetical uses
Name |
Type of Plant |
Acre-ft/yr |
MMgal/day |
Gal/MMBtu product |
Notes |
Colstrip 1-4 |
2094 MW PC |
28,652 |
25.6 |
168 |
2005; 575 gal/MWh |
Dakota Gasification |
170 MMcf/day (winter) synthetic
natural gas plant |
7,494 |
6.7 |
50 |
2004; doesn't include water embodied
in purchased electricity; doesn't assign any water consumption to co-products |
CTL plant (1:1 water:product) |
11,000 bbl/day |
414 |
0.4 |
7 |
Example; assumes all water use is
assigned to liquid fuel product; capacity factor =.8 |
CTL plant (7:1 water:product) |
11,000 bbl/day |
2,898 |
2.6 |
50 |
Example; assumes all water use is
assigned to liquid fuel product; capacity factor =.8 |
City of Helena |
27,000 people |
5,872 |
5.2 |
|
2002-2005 average |
Sugar beets |
1,000 acres |
1,830 |
1.6 |
|
Eastern Montana; optimal crop yields under
efficient and scheduled irrigation (derived from NRCS est.) |
Alfalfa |
1,000 acres |
2,000 |
1.8 |
|
Eastern Montana; optimal crop yields under
efficient and scheduled irrigation (derived from NRCS est.) |
|